ABSTRACT
The FDA-approved vaccine against the novel coronavirus developed by Pfizer and BioNTech became widely popular in Iraq. The study aims to evaluate the incidence of vaccine adverse reactions, and severity after first and second doses and to link some of the demographic criteria of recipients. This study included 850 adults (16 years and older), and the sample was collected from a randomly selected vaccination center in Baghdad, Iraq for the period January to March 2022. Study Participants were directly interviewed while taking the first dose. Later on, phone calls were used to monitor participants' self-reported local or systemic adverse reactions for one week after the first dose and second dose. The participants' age range was (19-76 years) with a mean of (46.2 ± 15.8) years. 59.9% were males. The mean body mass index (BMI) was (27.7 ±2.9). The incidence of vaccine adverse reactions after first and second doses were: first dose (local 17%, systemic 27%), second dose (local 27%, systemic 35%). Ordinal logistic regression analysis after adjusting for age, sex, and past medical history (PMHx) showed a higher incidence and severity in females and those with PMHx in nearly all the types of reactions except for chills (second dose) and PMHx (two doses), muscle or joint pain (two doses). Spearman's Rank test showed an insignificant correlation with any type of reaction. The vaccine is generally safe and adverse reactions are mild and tolerable in the majority of cases. ©2022 by authors, all rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Introduction Video consultation involves the live interaction between the doctor and the patient remotely. Prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, the majority of video consultations in primary care were provided by GPs who were not the individual's own GP, which presented safety and continuity issues. This study aims to determine GPs' attitudes to the use of video consultation for their own patients. Methods This was a qualitative study involving semi-structured interviews. Participants were purposively recruited through use of a GP tutor as a key informant and guided by a sampling framework to include those with and without previous video consultation experience. Braun and Clarke thematic analysis was used. Results Participants included eight GPs, half of whom had previously worked with video consultation. Four themes emerged: impact on the consultation, the potential role, and the potential threat to current practice and technology and logistics. There were optimistic and cautious observations within all themes. Conclusion With the increased use of video consultation, Irish General Practice is in a unique position to frame the future its use. The provision of this modality to one's own patients may provide benefit while mitigating some of the pitfalls but would not entirely avoid the potential dangers of video consultation.
ABSTRACT
Introduction Video consultation involves the live interaction between the doctor and the patient remotely. Prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, the majority of video consultations in primary care were provided by GPs who were not the individual’s own GP, which presented safety and continuity issues. This study aims to determine GPs’ attitudes to the use of video consultation for their own patients. Methods This was a qualitative study involving semi-structured interviews. Participants were purposively recruited through use of a GP tutor as a key informant and guided by a sampling framework to include those with and without previous video consultation experience. Braun and Clarke thematic analysis was used. Results Participants included eight GPs, half of whom had previously worked with video consultation. Four themes emerged: Impact on the consultation, the potential role, and the potential threat to current practice and technology and logistics. There were optimistic and cautious observations within all themes. Conclusion With the increased use of video consultation, Irish General Practice is in a unique position to frame the future its use. The provision of this modality to one’s own patients may provide benefit while mitigating some of the pitfalls but would not entirely avoid the potential dangers of video consultation. © 2021, Irish Medical Association. All rights reserved.